In a clear and decisive message, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reaffirmed that India will never accept third-party mediation on the Kashmir issue. Despite a 35-minute long phone conversation between PM Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump, the American leader continues to reiterate outdated and inaccurate statements regarding mediation—a stance that India firmly rejects.
This recurring claim by President Trump has raised eyebrows, especially given India’s unambiguous diplomatic position. Prime Minister Modi has conveyed in no uncertain terms that New Delhi has not, does not, and will not seek external intervention in the India-Pakistan conflict. India’s sovereignty, national security, and territorial integrity are non-negotiable, and these principles guide its foreign policy decisions.
It is vital for both domestic opposition parties and the international community to understand that this matter is not one of political rivalry, but of national interest. The Indian opposition is also urged to refrain from making light of the situation or turning it into political satire. If and when they come to power, they too may face similar international rhetoric. What then?
India respects international diplomacy but also values its own dignity. Prime Minister Modi's refusal of a U.S. invitation, citing prior commitments, is a reflection of India's rising global stature. At a time when world leaders line up for a meeting with the U.S. President, Modi's graceful but firm rejection speaks volumes about India’s self-assured diplomacy.
During the call, PM Modi briefed President Trump about Operation Sindoor and detailed the reality of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. He clarified that it was Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) who pleaded for a ceasefire, to which India's DGMO agreed only as a strategic decision—not out of weakness.
Importantly, this phone conversation came after the tragic Pahalgam massacre on April 22—raising questions about the timing and motive behind any purported request for mediation. PM Modi reiterated that terrorism is not merely a “proxy war” for India—it is a direct war, and India will respond accordingly in the future.
If President Trump continues to promote Pakistan as a “trusted ally,” despite India’s transparency, it likely stems from America’s strategic compulsions. Trump recently hosted Pakistan’s General Asim Munro at the White House for lunch—perhaps due to America’s growing interest in Pakistani mineral resources, and potential military needs tied to operations against Iran.
Strategic experts also point out that Pakistan’s Nur Khan Airbase, previously damaged by Indian strikes, is reportedly under U.S. control and is currently being repaired. Meanwhile, Washington has allegedly decided to make Pakistan the global hub for cryptocurrency ventures, with Trump’s son and son-in-law expected to spearhead operations.
In light of these developments, it is crucial for the Indian public to place its trust in official statements issued by the Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary, and the External Affairs Ministry. These voices represent the government of India and its strategic interests. All further discussions are now expected to take place in Parliament.